0.10/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.10/0.11	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.10/0.32	% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
0.10/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.32	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.10/0.32	% WCLimit    : 180
0.10/0.32	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 05:25:09 EDT 2024
0.10/0.32	% CPUTime    : 
0.17/0.45	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.17/0.46	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OXeYy6ziTh/E---3.1_18148.p
0.17/0.49	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.17/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHHN.
0.17/0.49	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 900s (5) cores
0.17/0.49	# Starting lpo9_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	# Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	# ho_unfolding_6 with pid 18229 completed with status 0
0.17/0.49	# Result found by ho_unfolding_6
0.17/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHHN.
0.17/0.49	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 900s (5) cores
0.17/0.49	# Starting lpo9_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	# Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	# No SInE strategy applied
0.17/0.49	# Search class: HHUNF-FFSF33-SHHSMMBN
0.17/0.49	# partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF33-SHHSMMBN
0.17/0.49	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.17/0.49	# Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	# new_ho_10 with pid 18231 completed with status 9
0.17/0.49	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 19s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	# ho_unfolding_6 with pid 18233 completed with status 0
0.17/0.49	# Result found by ho_unfolding_6
0.17/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHHN.
0.17/0.49	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 900s (5) cores
0.17/0.49	# Starting lpo9_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	# Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	# No SInE strategy applied
0.17/0.49	# Search class: HHUNF-FFSF33-SHHSMMBN
0.17/0.49	# partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF33-SHHSMMBN
0.17/0.49	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.17/0.49	# Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	# new_ho_10 with pid 18231 completed with status 9
0.17/0.49	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 19s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.17/0.49	
0.17/0.49	# Proof found!
0.17/0.49	# SZS status Theorem
0.17/0.49	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_24, type, mnot: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_25, type, mor: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_27, type, mimplies: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_32, type, mforall_prop: (($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_37, type, mbox: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_38, type, mdia: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_40, type, msymmetric: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_49, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_53, type, epred1_0: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_54, type, esk1_3: $i > ($i > $o) > $i > $i).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_55, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_56, type, esk3_0: $i).
0.17/0.49	thf(mimplies, axiom, ((mimplies)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X7:$i > $o]:(mor @ (mnot @ X6) @ X7))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OXeYy6ziTh/E---3.1_18148.p', mimplies)).
0.17/0.49	thf(mnot, axiom, ((mnot)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(~((X6 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OXeYy6ziTh/E---3.1_18148.p', mnot)).
0.17/0.49	thf(mor, axiom, ((mor)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X7:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((X6 @ X3)|(X7 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OXeYy6ziTh/E---3.1_18148.p', mor)).
0.17/0.49	thf(mdia, axiom, ((mdia)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o, X6:$i > $o]:(mnot @ (mbox @ X13 @ (mnot @ X6))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OXeYy6ziTh/E---3.1_18148.p', mdia)).
0.17/0.49	thf(mbox, axiom, ((mbox)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o, X6:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(![X14:$i]:((~((X13 @ X3 @ X14))|(X6 @ X14)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OXeYy6ziTh/E---3.1_18148.p', mbox)).
0.17/0.49	thf(mforall_prop, axiom, ((mforall_prop)=(^[X9:($i > $o) > $i > $o, X3:$i]:(![X10:$i > $o]:((X9 @ X10 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OXeYy6ziTh/E---3.1_18148.p', mforall_prop)).
0.17/0.49	thf(msymmetric, axiom, ((msymmetric)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o]:(![X15:$i, X16:$i]:(((X13 @ X15 @ X16)=>(X13 @ X16 @ X15)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OXeYy6ziTh/E---3.1_18148.p', msymmetric)).
0.17/0.49	thf(mvalid, axiom, ((mvalid)=(^[X6:$i > $o]:(![X3:$i]:((X6 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OXeYy6ziTh/E---3.1_18148.p', mvalid)).
0.17/0.49	thf(conj, conjecture, ![X13:$i > $i > $o]:(((msymmetric @ X13)<=(mvalid @ (mforall_prop @ (^[X18:$i > $o]:(mimplies @ X18 @ (mbox @ X13 @ (mdia @ X13 @ X18)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OXeYy6ziTh/E---3.1_18148.p', conj)).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_9, plain, ((mimplies)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((~((Z0 @ Z2)))|(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_10, plain, ((mnot)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i]:(~((Z0 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_11, plain, ((mor)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((Z0 @ Z2)|(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_12, plain, ((mdia)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~((![X22:$i]:((~((Z0 @ Z2 @ X22))|(~((Z1 @ X22)))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mdia])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_13, plain, ((mbox)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(![X14:$i]:((~((Z0 @ Z2 @ X14))|(Z1 @ X14)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_14, plain, ((mimplies)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((~((Z0 @ Z2)))|(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10]), c_0_11])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_15, plain, ((mforall_prop)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:($i > $o) > $i > $o, Z1:$i]:(![X10:$i > $o]:((Z0 @ X10 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mforall_prop])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_16, plain, ((mdia)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~((![X22:$i]:((~((Z0 @ Z2 @ X22))|(~((Z1 @ X22)))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_10]), c_0_13])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_17, plain, ((msymmetric)=(^[Z0/* 6 */:$i > $i > $o]:(![X15:$i, X16:$i]:(((Z0 @ X15 @ X16)=>(Z0 @ X16 @ X15)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[msymmetric])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_18, plain, ((mvalid)=(^[Z0/* 6 */:$i > $o]:(![X3:$i]:((Z0 @ X3))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ~(![X13:$i > $i > $o]:((![X28:$i, X27:$i > $o]:((~((X27 @ X28))|![X26:$i]:((~((X13 @ X28 @ X26))|~(![X25:$i]:((~((X13 @ X26 @ X25))|~((X27 @ X25)))))))))=>![X23:$i, X24:$i]:(((X13 @ X23 @ X24)=>(X13 @ X24 @ X23)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj])]), c_0_14]), c_0_15]), c_0_13]), c_0_16]), c_0_17]), c_0_18])])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ![X30:$i, X31:$i > $o, X32:$i]:(((((epred1_0 @ X32 @ (esk1_3 @ X30 @ X31 @ X32))|~(epred1_0 @ X30 @ X32)|~(X31 @ X30))&((X31 @ (esk1_3 @ X30 @ X31 @ X32))|~(epred1_0 @ X30 @ X32)|~(X31 @ X30)))&((epred1_0 @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)&~(epred1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])])])])])])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X14:$i, X4:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((X4 @ (esk1_3 @ X3 @ X4 @ X14))|~((epred1_0 @ X3 @ X14))|~((X4 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i > $o, X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X3 @ (esk1_3 @ X14 @ X4 @ X3))|~((epred1_0 @ X14 @ X3))|~((X4 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:((((esk1_3 @ X3 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(((Z0)=(X3)))) @ X14)=(X3))|~((epred1_0 @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_21])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X14:$i, X3:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X3 @ X14)|~((epred1_0 @ X14 @ X3)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23])])])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25]), c_0_26]), ['proof']).
0.17/0.49	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.17/0.49	# Parsed axioms                        : 64
0.17/0.49	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.17/0.49	# Initial clauses                      : 36
0.17/0.49	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 32
0.17/0.49	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
0.17/0.49	# Processed clauses                    : 9
0.17/0.49	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.17/0.49	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.17/0.49	# ...remaining for further processing  : 9
0.17/0.49	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.17/0.49	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.17/0.49	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.17/0.49	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.17/0.49	# Generated clauses                    : 51
0.17/0.49	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 46
0.17/0.49	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.17/0.49	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.17/0.49	# Paramodulations                      : 50
0.17/0.49	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.17/0.49	# NegExts                              : 0
0.17/0.49	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.17/0.49	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.17/0.49	# Total rewrite steps                  : 1
0.17/0.49	# ...of those cached                   : 0
0.17/0.49	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.17/0.49	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.17/0.49	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.17/0.49	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.17/0.49	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.17/0.49	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.17/0.49	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.17/0.49	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.17/0.49	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.17/0.49	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.17/0.49	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.17/0.49	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.17/0.49	# Current number of processed clauses  : 9
0.17/0.49	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
0.17/0.49	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.17/0.49	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.17/0.49	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 7
0.17/0.49	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 37
0.17/0.49	# ...number of literals in the above   : 176
0.17/0.49	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.17/0.49	# Current number of archived clauses   : 0
0.17/0.49	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 30
0.17/0.49	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
0.17/0.49	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.17/0.49	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.17/0.49	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.17/0.49	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.17/0.49	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.17/0.49	# Condensation attempts                : 9
0.17/0.49	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.17/0.49	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 8296
0.17/0.49	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 538
0.17/0.49	
0.17/0.49	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.49	# User time                : 0.006 s
0.17/0.49	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.17/0.49	# Total time               : 0.010 s
0.17/0.49	# Maximum resident set size: 1916 pages
0.17/0.49	
0.17/0.49	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.49	# User time                : 0.010 s
0.17/0.49	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.17/0.49	# Total time               : 0.014 s
0.17/0.49	# Maximum resident set size: 1788 pages
0.17/0.49	% E---3.1 exiting
0.17/0.49	% E exiting
0.17/0.49	EOF